April 29, 2019 dmh

The Careers and Enterprise Company will continue to be reliant on government handouts after ministers dropped their ambition for the quango to become self-sustaining.

Announcing the creation of the company in 2014, former education secretary Nicky Morgan, said that “in the longer term the company will sustain itself”.

But CEC’s new sustainability plan, seen by Schools Week, revealed the government has ditched this ambition.

We can also reveal government grants handed to the firm, which runs mentoring programmes in schools and a network of “enterprise advisers” to boost careers education in schools, rocketed by nearly two-thirds, up from £18.8 million in 2017-18, to £30.2 million in 2018-19.

Although the grant funding dropped to £24.3 million this year, the company has now received more than £95 million from the public purse.

The company’s original sustainability plan, published in 2016, said the CEC was “on track to achieve 50 per cent of alternative sources of income by 2017-2018”. The idea was to sell the company’s products to employers and make use of other funding sources.

However the new plan, obtained by Schools Week under the freedom of information act, shows CEC and the government “no longer envisage replacing government funding with alternative sources of income in the way that was originally intended when government set up the CEC”.

This is because the nature of the CEC’s work has “expanded significantly” to deliver the government’s careers strategy, it said.

The plan added there was “significant value to DfE continuing to fund the CEC”. However, the DfE expects the company to “continue to leverage additional funding to deliver its objectives”, including through match funding.

Since the CEC was launched, the company claims to have also “leveraged” £16.5 million from “other sources”. This includes £6.5 million from Local Enterprise Partnerships, which are themselves part-publicly funded, and £6.5 million came from investment funds.

The disclosure comes amid increasing pressure in recent years for CEC to prove its value for money.

In May last year, Claudia Harris and CEC chair Christine Hodgson were quizzed by MPs about the company’s £2 million research budget, its staffing structure and a lack of evidence that the organisation is making a difference.

Supporters of the company were subsequently urged to tweet their backing for the under-fire organisation after MPs raised questions about its impact and transparency.

The organisation was further criticised in November, when the House of Commons youth select committee urged the government to commission an independent review into whether the CEC is doing a good job helping poorer students get work experience.

And later that month, the company was blasted for spending more than £200,000 on two conferences, with MPs demanding to know why private sponsorship was not sought.

Reacting to the decision about the CEC’s future funding, Harris said: “That the government is continuing to invest in careers support for young people is enormously welcome.

“Ongoing government support will ensure continued rapid progress in line with its careers strategy and make sure all young people receive the vital opportunities and inspiration they need.”

A DfE spokesperson said: “The Careers and Enterprise Company has evolved greatly since it was set up in 2015.

“Since the launch of our careers strategy in 2017, the remit of the Careers and Enterprise Company has expanded and this government recognises that grant funding is necessary to fulfil their important role.”

This comes at a time when Careers England in its latest Newsletter informs its members:

“We were sad to hear the news that Inspiring Futures has gone into liquidation. It’s a real blow to the sector to see the closure of an organisation that has been successfully providing quality careers guidance to young people for over 75 years, and our thoughts are with the staff involved.” All other careers support providers including the National Careers Service, schools, colleges, local authorities, training providers etc are subject to Ofsted inspection, must meet quality standards (including matrix owned by DfE) and must adhere to transparency and accountability.


Leave a reply